In a presidential election year and with the ongoing Israel-Hamas war, I have been giving renewed thought to how schools can foster a culture of civil discourse and student engagement on the most pressing matters of our times. Outside of school, we see daily reminders of the poor example political leaders are setting for our students about how to have respectful, productive conversations. Education thought leader Grant Lichtman’s new taxonomy for 21st century learning suggests that, in today’s world, civility is the foundational skill upon which much deep learning rests. So what might be possible inside of schools?
I start with a few principles that have informed my thinking. In their study, The Political Classroom, Hess and McAvoy (2014), share evidence that when young people engage in political discourse in school that they are really learning about the process of deliberation. Students in such classrooms learn how to form arguments and how to weigh evidence. In the practice of political conversation, the skills learned are the skills of living in a democracy and understanding the common good.
A fundamental value of classrooms that engage in political discussion is that teachers must create a culture of fairness for all viewpoints. Teachers in JK-12 schools ought to maintain partisan neutrality even as they open their classrooms to these discussions. When teachers share their partisan preferences it establishes an unfair classroom culture and, despite our best intentions, may influence student thinking. We make a distinction between "political" and "partisan." Political is being involved in politics and political issues. To be partisan is to advance a specific cause or the agenda of a political party.
At CESJDS we have been working for many years to foster a culture of civil discourse that will serve as a counterweight to the toxic, meanspirited approach we see beyond our walls. We begin this work in the entry grades and weave it throughout a student’s educational journey. I want to share three teaching strategies we use to create classroom communities we can be proud of and which foster the essential skills students need to engage in difficult conversations. We have found all three to be effective tools for students and for faculty.
Three years ago, CESJDS enlisted Facing History and Ourselves to facilitate three workshops with our faculty on civil discourse. One protocol we worked on is called “Straight A’s for Effective Facilitation."
- First, we affirm and appreciate people’s comments and questions (when possible).
- Second, we acknowledge what people are saying.
- Last, we ask questions to better understand individuals’ behaviors and perspectives and to help them reflect on their views.
Another framework we have used is termed Heart/Head/Hand. This August, Jonathan Golden, a faculty member at the Shalom Hartman Institute, facilitated two sessions for our faculty on this methodology that he developed while teaching high school students. He shared how he used this protocol after the Hamas terror attacks on October 7. This strategy asks students to speak to three different areas:
- Heart (emotional/personal) - How do events in Israel make me feel? How do they relate to my identity and story? The story of the family and those whom I love? What are my hopes? Worries? Concerns? Aspirations?
- Head (analytical/knowledge/understanding) - What do I need to know in order to try and understand events, their history, and what might happen next?
- Hand (doing civil/action) - What are my options to take action to support those in need and ensure that I live out my beliefs and values?
One final example of an approach we use to foster civil discourse is Mahloket l’shem Shamayim/Argument for the sake of Heaven. The concept derives from the Mishnah where we learn: “Every argument that is [for the sake of] heaven’s name, it is destined to endure. But if it is not [for the sake of] heaven’s name, it is not destined to endure.” Our partners at the Pardes Institute of Jewish Studies in Jerusalem have developed the Mahloket Matters methodology that utilizes Jewish wisdom and social psychology to foster civil discourse. There are four pillars to this strategy that student learn:
- Debate the issue without attacking people
- Check your motivation - the goal is to solve problems, not win
- Listen to the other side with an open mind, recognizing that you might be wrong
- Consider that you might both be right, even when holding opposing views.
Today’s students are growing up in a world in which civility is at an all-time low, live discussion is toxic, and algorithms short-circuit civic literacy. Our schools, particularly independent pluralistic Jewish day schools, are uniquely positioned to be a countercultural force for good.